QUESTION: What were the theatres or
‘playhouses’ of Shakespeare’s time like and how were plays staged in them?
In Shakespeare’s time there were outdoor
playhouses and indoor playhouses. They were both very different and so they
attracted different audiences. The first playhouse was built in 1567 by John
Brayne and many more playhouses opened between the 1570s and the 1620s.
Therefore the public must have enjoyed going to them, as it was a major form of
entertainment.
Many of the playhouses were built outside
of the city walls and therefore south of the Thames. They did this in order to
avoid interference by the officials who ran the City of London. This is because
they thought that the playhouses were noisy and disruptive and that criminals
were attracted towards them. The south bank was outside of the city walls and
there were already many forms of entertainment available here, for example bear
baiting arenas. There were also brothels and taverns (which inspired
Shakespeare when creating the character of Falstaff), in which people could buy
food and drink, therefore people often travelled to the South Bank for
entertainment.
• a central yard that was open
to the sky;
• a raised stage sticking out
into the yard;
• a roof over the stage, which
was called ‘the heavens’, although the first Rose theatre (1587-92) may not
have had one;
• a tiring house behind the
stage with a backstage area, where actors dressed and waited to come on. Above this
were lords’ rooms, rooms for storage, and a room level with ‘the heavens’ to
work the special effects from;
• galleried seating all around
the yard, on several levels, which was roofed.
Most playhouses had a brick
base with timber-framed walls. The gaps between the timbers were filled with sticks,
hair and plaster. The roofs were made from
thatch or tile.
(information taken from http://www.shakespearesglobe.com/uploads/files/2015/04/playhouses.pdf)
Businessmen often sponsored and supported
the building of the playhouses. They did this because they realised the
increase of the popularity of playhouses and of the touring acting companies.
These businessmen often had a lot of money and so this would be a very good investment,
which could help them to increase their overall wealth. What the businessmen
did was they bought some land and built a playhouse on top of it, and then
rented it out to acting companies for a number of years. The company then paid
the businessman half of the takings.
QUESTION: Who were the actors of
Shakespeare’s plays and how did the experience of being an actor differ from
the experience today?
In Shakespeare's times actors usually
started off their careers as young boys. They often chose to join a company as
an apprentice in which they would not be paid but would learn the craft and be
taught by more experienced actors within a theatre company. In Shakespearean
times actors needed to be able to sing and dance, be able to move around
physically and sword fight et cetera as well as being able to remember their
lines well.
During Shakespeare's lifetime what an
actor went through on a daily basis changed drastically. When Shakespeare was
young actors toured with theatre companies. This involved travelling around
the country to perform in different cities, towns and in private venues for
example Inns and the homes of rich people. However, towards the end of
Shakespeare's life there were many different permanent theatres in London in
which actors could perform regularly, which would draw in much larger audiences than before.
However, even though theatres were a very
popular pass time, actors were not thought of very highly and they had quite a
bad reputation. They were seen as reckless, disorderly people who put the dream
of having a peaceful society at risk.
Shakespeare started out his career as an actor. Some people say that he played the part of the Ghost
in Hamlet.
Most theatre companies had a shareholder
system in operation. The shareholders of the company earned more than the
actors and the hired men. Shakespeare was a shareholder of the King's Men, and
the Chamberlain's Men, which meant that he shared both the expenses and the
profits. How much the actors made would also depend on the location in which
the show was playing. For example, a theatre company would make more money in
London than in the country and so they could pay the actors higher wages. And
example of this was that in 1597 the actor William Kendall was paid 10
shillings a week in London but only five shillings in the country.
Usually actors would perform in the
afternoon, this was because they needed natural light in order to be seen and
if they performed too early, it would be too bright and if they performed too
late, it would be too dark. Therefore, generally actors would spend the morning
rehearsing and then perform in the afternoon, and so they did not have much
time for rehearsals. They would have to be used to learning several different
scripts at one time.
The most famous Elizabethan actors were;
Richard Burbage, Edward Alleyn, Robert Armin William Kemp and Nathan Field.
Obviously there were many more actors than this but these were some of the most
famous ones.
A self-portrait of Richard Burbage
There were only a few copies of each play and so the actor would only have their own part to learn. They were given a script with their cues and their lines.
Certain actors were known to specialise.
These actors would often have parts written especially with them in mind. An example of this was that William Shakespeare wrote the part of Dogberry,
especially for William Kemp because of the fact that he was very good
at physical comedy.
A drawing of William Kemp
Therefore, as you can see, the life of an actor in Shakespearean times was extremely different from the life of an
actor nowadays. Firstly, they were not seen as a celebrity and instead they were
frowned upon. Secondly, an actor would have to learn several parts at one time
and they wouldn't get a long time to rehearse, lastly they would not be able to read the
whole script and so they would probably not have known what the play was about and
they would only be able to react at the time to their cue. I would
conclude that the life of an actor nowadays is probably a lot more enjoyable than
the life of an actor in Shakespearean times.




No comments:
Post a Comment